Positive Material Identification Market Size, Share, Opportunities, And Trends By Component (Equipment, Service), By Type (X-Ray Fluorescence, Optical Emission Spectroscopy), By Form Factor (Handheld, Benchtop), By Industry Vertical (Metallurgy, Aerospace & Defense, Oil & Gas, Chemical, Healthcare, Energy & Power, Others), And By Geography - Forecasts From 2025 To 2030

Description

Positive Material Identification Market Size:

The Positive Material Identification Market will grow from USD 3.319 billion in 2025 to USD 4.564 billion by 2030, fueled by a 6.58% compound annual growth rate (CAGR).

The positive material identification technique is used for determining the alloy composition of materials. The market for positive material identification is estimated to grow rapidly on account of a growing number of oil and gas refineries globally. Simultaneously, the growing investment in pharmaceutical manufacturing is further supplementing the growth of the market. Moreover, the focus on optimizing the cost of production is further anticipated to drive the market during the forecast period.

This research study examines the current market trends related to demand, supply, and sales, in addition to the recent developments. Major drivers, restraints, and opportunities have been covered to provide an exhaustive picture of the market. The analysis presents in-depth information regarding the development, trends, and industry policies and regulations implemented in each of the geographical regions. Further, the overall regulatory framework of the market has been exhaustively covered to offer stakeholders a better understanding of the key factors affecting the overall market environment.

Identification of key industry players in the industry and their revenue contribution to the overall business or relevant segment aligned to the study have been covered as a part of competitive intelligence done through extensive secondary research. Various studies and data published by industry associations, analyst reports, investor presentations, press releases and journals among others have been taken into consideration while conducting the secondary research. Both bottom-up and top-down approaches have been utilized to determine the market size of the overall market and key segments. The values obtained are correlated with the primary inputs of the key stakeholders in the positive material identification value chain. The last step involves complete market engineering which includes analyzing the data from different sources and existing proprietary datasets while using various data triangulation methods for market breakdown and forecasting.

Market intelligence is presented in the form of analysis, charts, and graphics to help the clients in gaining a faster and more efficient understanding of the positive material identification market.

Major industry players profiled as part of the report are SGS SA, TÜV NORD GROUP, Olympus Corporation, Intertek Group plc, and Bureau Veritas among others.

Segmentation

The positive material identification market has been analyzed through following segments:

By Component

• Equipment
• Service

By Type

• X-Ray Fluorescence
• Optical Emission Spectroscopy

By Form Factor

• Handheld
• Benchtop

By Industry Vertical

• Metallurgy
• Aerospace & Defense
• Oil & Gas
• Chemical
• Healthcare
• Energy & Power
• Others

By Geography

• North America
  • USA
  • Canada
  • Mexico
  • Others
• South America
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Others
• Europe
  • Germany
  • France
  • United Kingdom
  • Others
• Middle East and Africa
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Israel
  • Others
• Asia Pacific
  • China
  • Japan
  • India
  • Others

Table Of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Market Overview

1.2. Market Definition

1.3. Scope of the Study

1.4. Currency

1.5. Assumptions

1.6. Base, and Forecast Years Timeline

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

2.1. Research Design

2.2. Secondary Sources

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET DYNAMICS

4.1. Market Segmentation

4.2. Market Drivers

4.3. Market Restraints

4.4. Market Opportunities

4.5. Porter’s Five Force Analysis

4.5.1. Bargaining Power of Suppliers

4.5.2. Bargaining Power of Buyers

4.5.3. Threat of New Entrants

4.5.4. Threat of Substitutes

4.5.5. Competitive Rivalry in the Industry

4.6. Life Cycle Analysis - Regional Snapshot

4.7. Market Attractiveness

5. POSITIVE MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION MARKET BY COMPONENT

5.1. Equipment

5.2. Service

6. POSITIVE MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION MARKET BY TYPE

6.1. X-Ray Fluorescence

6.2. Optical Emission Spectroscopy

7. POSITIVE MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION MARKET BY FORM FACTOR

7.1. Handheld

7.2. Benchtop

8. POSITIVE MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION MARKET BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL

8.1. Metallurgy

8.2. Aerospace & Defense

8.3. Oil & Gas

8.4. Chemical

8.5. Healthcare

8.6. Energy & Power

8.7. Others

9. POSITIVE MATERIAL IDENITIFICATION MARKET BY GEOGRAPHY

9.1. North America

9.1.1. USA

9.1.2. Canada

9.1.3. Mexico

9.1.4. Others

9.2. South America

9.2.1. Brazil

9.2.2. Argentia

9.2.3. Others

9.3. Europe

9.3.1. Germany

9.3.2. France

9.3.3. United Kingdom

9.3.4. Others

9.4. Middle East and Africa

9.4.1. Saudi Arabia

9.4.2. Israel

9.4.3. Others

9.5. Asia Pacific

9.5.1. China

9.5.2. Japan

9.5.3. India

9.5.4. Others

10. COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE

10.1. Competition and Offerings Analysis of Key Vendors

10.2. Recent Investment and Deals

10.3. Strategies of Key Players

11. COMPANY PROFILES

11.1. Olympus Corporation

11.2. SGS SA

11.3. Ametek

11.4. TÜV Rheinland

11.5. Bureau Veritas

11.6. Intertek Group plc

11.7. TÜV NORD GROUP

11.8. Bruker

11.9. QC Metallurgical Laboratory, Inc.

11.10. Applus

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF TABLES

Companies Profiled

Olympus Corporation

SGS SA

Ametek

TÜV Rheinland

Bureau Veritas

Intertek Group plc

TÜV NORD GROUP

Bruker

QC Metallurgical Laboratory, Inc.

Applus

TÜV SÜD

Related Reports