US AI In Diagnostics Market - Forecasts From 2025 To 2030

Report CodeKSI061618219
PublishedNov, 2025

Description

US AI In Diagnostics Market is anticipated to expand at a high CAGR over the forecast period.

US AI In Diagnostics Market Key Highlights

  • Accelerated clinical adoption and rapid internalization signal a strong, verifiable surge in end-user demand for AI-based diagnostics.
  • The US Food and Drug Administration is actively adapting its regulatory framework to address software as a medical device that utilizes evolving AI algorithms, demonstrating a formal process to integrate these dynamic tools safely into clinical practice.
  • The medical industry imperative toward integrating deep learning-based cancer screening and diagnostic tools directly into large-scale diagnostic imaging networks, vertically integrating AI into the service delivery model.
  • The primary area of opportunity identified of US physicians for AI adoption is the reduction of administrative and documentation burdens, which directly translates into demand for AI solutions that streamline clinical workflow rather than solely focusing on pure diagnostic assistance.

The US AI in Diagnostics market is undergoing a profound structural shift, moving from a niche technology to an indispensable component of clinical workflow across high-volume diagnostic segments. This transition is predicated on the dual pressures of managing escalating chronic disease prevalence and mitigating critical workforce shortages, particularly among specialists like radiologists. The commercial focus is firmly on delivering verified, regulatory-cleared software that seamlessly integrates into existing Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) and Electronic Health Records (EHRs).

US AI In Diagnostics Market Analysis

Growth Drivers

The primary catalyst propelling market expansion is the critical shortage of specialist physicians, directly increasing demand for automated assistance. With significant percentages of radiologist job searches remaining unfilled, the industry requires AI to act as a force multiplier, ranking cases and identifying anomalies to offload high-volume workload from human analysts. This demand is further amplified by the exponential growth in medical imaging data (CT, MRI, X-ray), for which advanced Deep Learning and Natural Language Processing algorithms are necessary to manage and interpret, preventing diagnostic backlogs.

The growing emphasis on early and precise disease detection, particularly for conditions like cancer and neurological disorders, creates direct demand for AI to identify subtle patterns in images and genomic data earlier than traditional human observation, thereby improving clinical outcomes and resource utilization.

Challenges and Opportunities

A significant constraint on the market is the fragmentation and non-interoperability of data, which creates an obstacle for seamlessly integrating new AI tools with established EHR and imaging platforms. This friction decreases demand by raising implementation costs and workflow disruption. Conversely, a major opportunity lies in the application of Explainable AI (XAI), which increases clinician trust and, consequently, adoption rates by providing transparency into the AI's decision-making process. Furthermore, the rising need for AI accelerators and high-performance graphics processing Units (GPUs) at the point of care drives demand for hardware components that can support real-time inference, opening a strategic opportunity for hardware manufacturers within this primarily software-driven market.

Raw Material and Pricing Analysis

The US AI In Diagnostics market is predominantly a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) and service-based offering. It is categorized as an intangible asset; therefore, a raw material and pricing analysis focused on physical components (e.g., chemicals, electronics, materials) is not applicable to this market. The primary cost drivers for this market reside in data acquisition, algorithm training (computational costs and specialist data scientist salaries), regulatory compliance processes, and intellectual property development, rather than physical supply chain costs.

Supply Chain Analysis

The global supply chain for AI in diagnostics is primarily a digital data and software-centric value chain, rather than a physical one, built on layers of dependencies. The key production hubs are concentrated in established global technology clusters—specifically the US, China, and Western Europe—where the talent pool for machine learning engineers and clinical data scientists resides. Logistical complexities revolve around data sovereignty, security, and the clinical annotation of massive, diverse datasets, not the transport of physical goods. The market exhibits a heavy dependency on semiconductor manufacturers (e.g., NVIDIA, AMD) for high-performance computing hardware (GPUs/accelerators) essential for training and running complex deep learning models in data centers and at the edge. Geopolitical factors, such as tariffs on specific high-performance computing hardware from China, would increase the capital expenditure for AI model training and deployment. This elevated cost would be passed on to US diagnostic providers, acting as a frictional headwind that restrains the rapid adoption and scaling of AI services by smaller Diagnostic Laboratories and Clinics.

Government Regulations

Key government regulations in the US primarily govern data handling and device approval, shaping the market structure and directly impacting the time-to-market and compliance costs for manufacturers.

Jurisdiction Key Regulation / Agency Market Impact Analysis
United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) FDA 510(k) and De Novo clearances for AI-enabled SaMD validate clinical utility and safety, directly enabling market entry and increasing clinician trust, which accelerates demand. Focus is on Good Machine Learning Practices (GMLP).
United States Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Mandates stringent rules for the security and privacy of Protected Health Information (PHI). This restricts the ease of data sharing and aggregation for model training, posing a significant logistical and legal challenge that increases the cost of data acquisition and model development, thus acting as a constraint on the supply side.

US AI In Diagnostics Market In-Depth Segment Analysis

By Diagnostic Type: Radiology

The Radiology segment represents the most mature and dominant application area in the US AI in Diagnostics market, driven by quantifiable metrics of demand. The confluence of a chronic radiologist shortage and an unrelenting increase in imaging volume (CT, MRI, X-ray) creates an acute need for AI to maintain operational efficiency. This environment propels demand for AI to automate non-interpretive tasks, such as protocoling studies and optimizing hanging protocols, and high-impact triage functions, such as flagging critical findings in real time to reduce turnaround times in emergency settings. Furthermore, the integration of AI models, like those for breast density assessment and lesion characterization, directly contributes to value-based care initiatives by demonstrably improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing diagnostic error rates, making these tools an operational imperative for US hospitals and imaging centers.

By End-User: Hospitals and Clinics

Hospitals and Clinics constitute the largest end-user segment due to their high patient volumes, complexity of cases, and mandate to improve both clinical outcomes and financial performance. Demand from this segment is specifically driven by the need for AI to optimize clinical workflow and address administrative burnout. Tools that can automate documentation of billing codes, generate chart summaries, and assist in creating discharge instructions are in high demand as they directly reduce non-clinical staff burdens. Moreover, large hospital systems are focused on integrating AI into multi-modality diagnostic pathways across Radiology, Cardiology, and Oncology to achieve greater standardization of care. Their investment capacity allows for the adoption of comprehensive enterprise-level AI platforms (Software) that are seamlessly integrated with EHRs, contrasting with the more fragmented adoption patterns of smaller clinics.

US AI In Diagnostics Market Competitive Environment and Analysis

The US AI in Diagnostics market exhibits a distinct competitive structure, dominated by two categories of players: legacy, multinational medical technology conglomerates and innovative, agile pure-play AI software developers.

  • Siemens Healthineers AG- Siemens Healthineers holds a strategic position by embedding AI directly into its vast installed base of diagnostic imaging hardware (MRI, CT, X-ray). The company's strategy, anchored by its AI-Rad Companion portfolio, is to deliver a seamlessly integrated, multi-modality AI solution.
  • IBM Corporation- IBM’s positioning is centered on the IBM Watson Health platform (specifically related to its AI and data management expertise, although parts of the health division were divested) and its enterprise-level data and AI services. The company focuses on the high-level infrastructure required for AI implementation, including data governance, security, and cloud deployment, utilizing its WatsonX suite of AI tools.

US AI In Diagnostics Market Recent Developments

  • In August 2025, DeepHealth, Inc. (a RadNet Subsidiary) FDA Clearance DeepHealth received FDA 510(k) clearance for TechLive™, a remote scanning solution. This software enables centralized operation and supervision of MR, CT, PET/CT, and Ultrasound procedures from a remote location.

US AI In Diagnostics Market Segmentation

  • By Component
    • Software
    • Hardware
  • By Diagnostic Type
    • Radiology
    • Pathology
    • Cardiology
    • Oncology
    • Neurology
    • Others
  • By Application
    • Disease Detection
    • Image Analysis
    • Risk Assessment
    • Predictive Analysis
    • Others
  • By End-User
    • Hospitals And Clinics
    • Diagnostic Laboratories
    • Research Institutions
    • Others

Table Of Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2. MARKET SNAPSHOT

2.1. Market Overview

2.2. Market Definition

2.3. Scope of the Study

2.4. Market Segmentation

3. BUSINESS LANDSCAPE

3.1. Market Drivers

3.2. Market Restraints

3.3. Market Opportunities

3.4. Porter's Five Forces Analysis

3.5. Industry Value Chain Analysis

3.6. Policies and Regulations

3.7. Strategic Recommendations

4. TECHNOLOGICAL OUTLOOK

5. US AI IN DIAGNOSTICS MARKET BY COMPONENT

5.1. Introduction

5.2. Software

5.3. Hardware

6. US AI IN DIAGNOSTICS MARKET BY DIAGNOSTIC TYPE

6.1. Introduction

6.2. Radiology

6.3. Pathology

6.4. Cardiology

6.5. Oncology

6.6. Neurology

6.7. Others

7. US AI IN DIAGNOSTICS MARKET BY APPLICATION

7.1. Introduction

7.2. Disease Detection

7.3. Image Analysis

7.4. Risk Assessment

7.5. Predictive Analysis

7.6. Others

8. US AI IN DIAGNOSTICS MARKET BY END USER

8.1. Introduction

8.2. Hospitals And Clinics

8.3. Diagnostic Laboratories

8.4. Research Institutions

8.5. Others

9. COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT AND ANALYSIS

9.1. Major Players and Strategy Analysis

9.2. Market Share Analysis

9.3. Mergers, Acquisitions, Agreements, and Collaborations

9.4. Competitive Dashboard

10. COMPANY PROFILES

10.1. IBM Corporation

10.2. General Electric (GE) Company

10.3. Siemens Healthineers AG

10.4. Aidoc Medical Ltd.

10.5. Zebra Medical Vision Ltd.

10.6. Butterfly Network, Inc.

10.7. Viz.Ai, Inc.

10.8. Imagen Technologies, Inc.

10.9. Alivecor, Inc.

10.10. Pathai, Inc.

11. APPENDIX

11.1. Currency

11.2. Assumptions

11.3. Base and Forecast Years Timeline

11.4. Key benefits for the stakeholders

11.5. Research Methodology

11.6. Abbreviations

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF TABLES

Companies Profiled

IBM Corporation

General Electric (GE) Company

Siemens Healthineers AG

Aidoc Medical Ltd.

Zebra Medical Vision Ltd.

Butterfly Network, Inc.

Viz.Ai, Inc.

Imagen Technologies, Inc.

Alivecor, Inc.

Pathai, Inc.  

Related Reports

Report Name Published Month Download Sample