Carbon-neutral Shipping Market Size, Share, Opportunities, And Trends By Shipping Mode (Air Freight, Ocean Freight, Road Freight, Rail Freight), By Service Type (Carbon Offsetting, Eco-Friendly Logistics, Sustainable Packaging, Green Fuel Adoption), By End-User Industry (E-commerce & Retail, Automotive, Food & Beverage, Pharmaceuticals, Manufacturing & Industrial), And By Geography - Forecasts From 2025 To 2030

Carbon-neutral Shipping Market Size:

The carbon-neutral shipping market is expected to increase at a CAGR of 8.72%.

Carbon-neutral Shipping Market Trends:

The carbon-neutral shipping industry operates within logistics and transport as it aims to eliminate or balance emissions that result from shipping goods. This is often done using fuel-efficient technologies, alternative fuel sources (such as biofuel or green hydrogen), operational efficiency measures, and carbon offset strategies like reforestation or investments in renewable energy schemes. Carbon-neutral shipping involves all parties, including shipping lines, logistics operators and regulators, and carbon offset suppliers who operate in seaside and land-based cargo activities.

The carbon-neutral shipping market continues to develop because environmental standards worldwide grow tighter while green consumers intensify their requirements and corporations launch sustainability programs. The industry pushes toward sustainability because of regulations established by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) with decarbonization targets and existing regional carbon pricing frameworks. Leading manufacturers and e-commerce companies establish carbon-neutral supply chain operations that increase market requirements for emissions reduction solutions in shipping services. The market benefits from emerging technologies for green fuel development and emission monitoring platforms, enabling the implementation and cost-effectiveness of carbon-neutral operations.

Carbon-neutral Shipping Market Overview & Scope:

The carbon-neutral shipping market is segmented by:

• Shipping Mode: Air freight controls the biggest portion of the carbon-neutral shipping market through shipping modes because its high carbon emission rates exceed those of alternative transport methods. Although carrying fewer global shipments, the air freight industry produces high transport emissions, requiring urgent reductions. The growing pressure for environmental sustainability among customers has spurred airlines and logistics companies to adopt carbon offset mechanisms alongside sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) and passengers. These developments support regulatory requirements.
• Service Type: The market segments into four categories based on service type, with carbon offsetting as one section and eco-friendly logistics, sustainable packaging, and green fuel adoption as separate sections.
• End-User Industry: The end-user industry actively seeks carbon-neutral shipping alternatives due to expanding consumer interest in sustainable brands while retail and e-commerce operate steadily in the market. Retailers must decrease last-mile and international logistics’ environmental impact because online shopping continues its strong market growth. The Mexican Online Sales Association shows that eCommerce in Mexico registered USD 26.2 billion in 2022 and experienced a 23% growth from 2021.

Large e-commerce companies are adding carbon-neutral shipping options, making green packaging investments, and working with logistics companies that provide carbon offset or low-emission transport. The dual benefit of this initiative is that it helps firms fulfill their ESG requirements within their organization and acquire a distinctive market advantage by targeting environmentally conscious customers while aligning with evolving regulations.

• Region:  North America will dominate the carbon-neutral shipping industry because the region receives strong regulatory support and innovative technology and corporate sustainability initiatives. The region has large logistics and e-commerce players actively investing in green shipping options, such as electric delivery fleets, sustainable aviation fuels, and carbon offsetting programs.

Top Trends Shaping the Carbon-neutral Shipping Market:

1. Global Carbon Pricing Initiatives

• The IMO is aiming to introduce the world's first carbon tax on shipping emissions towards net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by sometime around 2050. Suggestions involve a straight fee per ton of emissions and a marine fuel standard to help shift to cleaner fuels such as hydrogen and ammonia. Strong opposition has come, however, from nations such as the United States, which has objected on the grounds of economic impact and fairness.

2. Technological Innovations and Digitalization

• Technological advancements and digitalization are taking center stage in spearheading the shift to carbon-neutral shipping. Electric and hybrid ships, rotor sails, and kite systems help reduce fossil fuel dependence, particularly in port operations and brief travel distances, while utilizing renewable power to reduce emissions. Vessel and maintenance schedule optimization happens in real-time through digital twins and AI and data analytics tools that optimize route planning for increased operational efficiency.

Carbon-neutral Shipping Market Growth Drivers vs. Challenges:

Drivers:

• Government Regulations: Global organizations and governments implement stricter emission regulations, giving the shipping industry an essential reason to shift toward decarbonization. The IMO has taken steps such as the Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) and the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI), compelling shipowners to retrofit or replace inefficient ships. The EU is also bringing shipping into its Emissions Trading System (ETS), pricing carbon emissions. These regulatory schemes compel change and induce innovation and investment in environment-friendly maritime solutions.
• Port and Logistics Infrastructure Evolution: Ports globally are transforming to accommodate low-carbon shipping. Green infrastructure investments—like shore power (cold ironing), electric charging points, and clean fuel bunkering—are increasingly being made. These intelligent, energy-efficient ports minimize emissions generated while vessels are in port and enhance overall logistical effectiveness. Collaborative action between shipping lines and port authorities is key to developing end-to-end carbon-neutral shipping systems.

Challenges:

• High Transition Costs:  One of the major obstacles to carbon-neutral shipping is that it costs a lot of capital. It could cost millions per ship to retrofit a ship currently in use or to construct entirely new zero-emission ships. Likewise, making or procuring low-carbon fuels requires expensive initial investments. For most shipping companies—particularly smaller ones—the financial requirements constitute a disincentive. However, due to heavy subsidization or incentivization, decarbonization is not a huge economic priority.

Carbon-neutral Shipping Market Regional Analysis:

• Asia-Pacific: The Asia-Pacific carbon-neutral shipping market is driven by economic, regulatory, and technological drivers. Governments in the region—most notably China, Japan, and South Korea—are introducing strict emission regulations and green port programs to support global climate targets. Large regional shipping operators are investing in low-emission ships and alternative fuels like LNG, green methanol, and ammonia to remain competitive and address increasing global sustainability expectations.

Carbon-neutral Shipping Market Competitive Landscape:

The market is fragmented, with many notable players, including CMA CGM Group, Costamare Inc., and MAN Energy Solutions, among others:

• Product Launch: In September 2024, Amogy, a leader in mature, scalable, and efficient ammonia-to-power solutions, announced the successful completion of the world's first carbon-free, ammonia-fueled maritime vessel's maiden voyage. The NH3 Kraken, a tugboat initially built in 1957 and refurbished with Amogy's ammonia-to-electric power system, navigated up a tributary of the Hudson River from New York City.
• Product Launch: In April 2024, Ocean Network Express (ONE), one of the world's premier shipping companies, today unveiled its lower emissions shipping service – ONE LEAF+, to fulfill the collective decarbonization ambitions of the shipping sector. ONE LEAF+ enables customers to actively take control of their emissions and reduce their environmental footprint along the value chain.

Carbon-neutral Shipping Market Scope:

Report Metric	Details
Growth Rate	CAGR of 8.72%
Study Period	2020 to 2030
Historical Data	2020 to 2023
Base Year	2024
Forecast Period	2025 – 2030
Forecast Unit (Value)	USD Billion
Segmentation	Shipping Mode Service Type End-User Industry Geography
Geographical Segmentation	North America, South America, Europe, Middle East and Africa, Asia Pacific
List of Major Companies in the Carbon-neutral Shipping Market	A.P. Møller-Mærsk A/S (Maersk) Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. (MSC) CMA CGM Group Costamare Inc. MAN Energy Solutions SE
Customization Scope	Free report customization with purchase

Carbon-neutral Shipping Market Segmentation:

By Shipping Mode

• Air Freight
• Ocean Freight
• Road Freight
• Rail Freight

By Service Type

• Carbon Offsetting
• Eco-Friendly Logistics
• Sustainable Packaging
• Green Fuel Adoption

By End-User Industry

• E-commerce & Retail
• Automotive
• Food & Beverage
• Pharmaceuticals
• Manufacturing & Industrial

By Geography

• North America
• Europe
• Asia Pacific
• South America
• Middle East & Africa

 

Our Best-Performing Industry Reports:

• Dry Bulk Shipping Market
• Protective Packaging Market
• Insulated Shipping Boxes Market

---

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

2. MARKET SNAPSHOT

2.1. Market Overview

2.2. Market Definition

2.3. Scope of the Study

2.4. Market Segmentation

3. BUSINESS LANDSCAPE 

3.1. Market Drivers

3.2. Market Restraints

3.3. Market Opportunities 

3.4. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis

3.5. Industry Value Chain Analysis

3.6. Policies and Regulations 

3.7. Strategic Recommendations 

4. CARBON-NEUTRAL SHIPPING MARKET BY SHIPPING MODE

4.1. Introduction

4.2. Air Freight

4.3. Ocean Freight

4.4. Road Freight

4.5. Rail Freight

5. CARBON-NEUTRAL SHIPPING MARKET BY SERVICE TYPE

5.1. Introduction

5.2. Carbon Offsetting

5.3. Eco-Friendly Logistics

5.4. Sustainable Packaging

5.5. Green Fuel Adoption

6. CARBON-NEUTRAL SHIPPING MARKET BY END-USER INDUSTRY

6.1. Introduction

6.2. E-commerce & Retail

6.3. Automotive

6.4. Food & Beverage

6.5. Pharmaceuticals

6.6. Manufacturing & Industrial

7. CARBON-NEUTRAL SHIPPING MARKET BY GEOGRAPHY

7.1. Introduction

7.2. North America

7.2.1. By Shipping Mode

7.2.2. By Service Type

7.2.3. By End-User Industry

7.2.4. By Country

7.2.4.1. USA

7.2.4.2. Canada

7.2.4.3. Mexico

7.3. South America

7.3.1. By Shipping Mode

7.3.2. By Service Type

7.3.3. By End-User Industry

7.3.4. By Country

7.3.4.1. Brazil

7.3.4.2. Argentina

7.3.4.3. Others

7.4. Europe

7.4.1. By Shipping Mode

7.4.2. By Service Type

7.4.3. By End-User Industry

7.4.4. By Country

7.4.4.1. United Kingdom

7.4.4.2. Germany

7.4.4.3. France

7.4.4.4. Spain

7.4.4.5. Others

7.5. Middle East and Africa

7.5.1. By Shipping Mode

7.5.2. By Service Type

7.5.3. By End-User Industry

7.5.4. By Country

7.5.4.1. Saudi Arabia

7.5.4.2. UAE

7.5.4.3. Others

7.6. Asia Pacific

7.6.1. By Shipping Mode

7.6.2. By Service Type

7.6.3. By End-User Industry

7.6.4. By Country

7.6.4.1. China

7.6.4.2. Japan

7.6.4.3. India

7.6.4.4. South Korea

7.6.4.5. Taiwan

7.6.4.6. Others

8. COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT AND ANALYSIS

8.1. Major Players and Strategy Analysis

8.2. Market Share Analysis

8.3. Mergers, Acquisitions, Agreements, and Collaborations

8.4. Competitive Dashboard

9. COMPANY PROFILES

9.1. A.P. Møller-Mærsk A/S (Maersk)

9.2. Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. (MSC)

9.3. CMA CGM Group

9.4. Costamare Inc.

9.5. MAN Energy Solutions SE

9.6. Einride AB

9.7. DHL Group

9.8. Hapag-Lloyd AG

9.9. Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp.

9.10. Evergreen Marine Corp.

9.11. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK Line)

9.12. Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA

10. APPENDIX

10.1. Currency 

10.2. Assumptions

10.3. Base and Forecast Years Timeline

10.4. Key benefits for the stakeholders

10.5. Research Methodology 

10.6. Abbreviations 

A.P. Møller-Mærsk A/S (Maersk)

Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A. (MSC)

CMA CGM Group

Costamare Inc.

MAN Energy Solutions SE

Einride AB

DHL Group

Hapag-Lloyd AG

Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp.

Evergreen Marine Corp.

Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK Line)

Wallenius Wilhelmsen ASA