U.S. tariff and trade measures are reshaping automotive tire imports, reducing reliance on China while increasing sourcing from Thailand, Mexico, Canada, Japan, and other suppliers. AD/CVD duties and new Section 301 actions are raising compliance and procurement costs, encouraging supply-chain diversification, nearshoring, and greater domestic tire production across the sector.
Broad tariff measures undertaken to prevent unfair foreign practices affecting U.S commerce have directly influenced structures, pricing, and sourcing patterns of automotive tires in the U.S. As a result, the nation has imposed high antidumping (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD) on China, followed by tariffs imposed on Chinese goods under “Section 301” of the Trade Act of 1974, which have altered procurement strategies.
Southeast Asian nations like Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia, classified under the HTS Code 4011 of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC), have become significant sources for PVLT (Passenger Vehicles and Light Trucks), along with other Asian economies like Japan and South Korea.
Factors Influencing U.S Automotive Tire Imports:
High tariffs on Chinese goods shifted automotive manufacturers’ preference to other key regions in Southeast Asia and East Asia for tire imports.
Countervailing duty imposed on PVLT tires imports from Vietnam and antidumping duty imposed on PVLT tire imports from South Korea, Thailand and Taiwan have raised the import cost. (Five-Year Review of these was instituted in mid-2026)
Supply to commercial fleets has been disrupted, especially for TBR (Thai Truck and Bus Radial Tires). Importers are diverting their procurement sources to neighboring nations like Mexico and Canada.
High import costs have increased the overall input cost, thereby making it difficult for retailers and domestic distributors to improve their profit margins amid high price increases.
Tariffs & Policy Impact
Policies & Tariffs Measure | Description |
Antidumping (AD) and Countervailing Duties (CVD) |
|
Section 301 under the Trade Act of 1973 |
|
New Tariffs Imposed under Section 301 |
|
Source: USTR.Gov
Changing Source of Imported Tires
Post-restrictions on major trading partners like China, the U.S. market has diversified its supply channels for automotive tires, with Southeast Asian nations forming a major share of the imports. According to the U.S Census Bureau/ International Trade Data, from March to July 2026, under HTS 4011 (Classifies New Pneumatic Tires of Rubber) nearly USD 7.2 billion of imports for consumption was recorded.
Origin Countries | Percent Share Under HTS 4011 | Import Value (US$) |
Thailand | 17.6% | US$1.27 Billion |
Mexico | 12.6% | US$908 Million |
Canada | 11.8% | US$851 Million |
Japan | 9.6% | US$693 Million |
Cambodia | 8.2% | US$587 Million |
Vietnam | 8.0% | US$577 Million |
Indonesia | 3.9% | US$284 Million |
South Korea | 3.5% | US$249 Million |
India | 2.9% | US$211 Million |
Brazil | 2.8% | US$205 Million |
Source: U.S Census/ International Trade API
TOP Tire Importing Nations in June 2026
Origin Nations | Import Value (US$) |
Thailand | US$248 Million |
Mexico | US$184 Million |
Canada | US$177 Million |
Japan | US$120 Million |
Vietnam | US$116 Million |
Source: OEC
Impact on Business & Consumers
High tariffs imposed by the government to restrict unfair trade practices have limited the purchasing power of buyers from major origin countries. Likewise, additional AD measures undertaken in 2024 have further restricted the supply of truck and bus tires from nations like Thailand.
Limited import volume due to high tariffs has encouraged domestic tires manufacturers to capitalize on the growing tires demand since automotive manufacturing is progressing in the U.S. According to the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers (OICA), in Q1 2026, automotive production in the U.S reached 2.55 million units, representing a 2% growth over Q1 2025. Likewise, the U.S. Tire Manufacturers Association (USTMA) predicts that total U.S. tire shipments will reach 338.9 million units in 2026 and will show positive growth over 336.6 million units shipped in 2025.
Tires Type | 2026 (Forecast)/ Million Units | 2025/ Million Unit |
Original Equipment | ||
Passenger | 41.6 | 41.3 |
Light Truck & Truck | 11.2 | 10.8 |
Replacement | ||
Passenger | 223.3 | 221.9 |
Light Truck & Truck | 62.7 | 62.4 |
TOTAL SHIPMENT | 338.9 | 336.3 |
Source: U.S Tire Manufacturers Association (USTMA)
Legal & Regulatory Uncertainty
Diversified Manufacturing Strategies
Leading tire manufacturers are taking steps to lessen the effects of tariffs by moving or increasing their production in countries that are not targeted by the tariffs. To secure long-term, supply bases unaffected by tariffs, supply-base enterprises have invested in their factories located in Vietnam, India, and Indonesia.
Nearshoring and USMCA Benefits
Mexico is becoming an increasingly appealing center for tire manufacturing, due to the excellent trade conditions provided by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). The shorter shipping times and the absence of tariffs give nearshoring a competitive advantage in the market.
Legal & Regulatory Uncertainty
Tariffs imposed by the AD/CVD law go through administrative reviews, where officials determine whether to change the rates or issue retroactive payments. Consequently, importers face a financial risk as they must must adhere to strict customs documentation and bonding requirements to comply with the law. Legal conflicts at the World Trade Organization (WTO) and diplomatic protests from affected countries add another level of uncertainty. Though these issues may have an impact on future policy, they hardly ever lead to quick changes. Moreover, there is a bipartisan consensus in the U.S. to support domestic tire production against cheap imports. The political stability among parties minimizes the likelihood of tariff reductions in the near future.
Explore More Reports:
Have questions?
More Thought Articles
How EV Charger Manufacturers Can Capitalize on India’s Home Charging Revolution
India’s residential EV charging opportunity is expanding as policy support, EV adoption, and private parking infrastructure develop. Manufacturers can capture value beyond AC chargers through installation, smart charging, load management, solar integration, software, and after-sales services. Housing societies, automakers, and property developers offer scalable routes to residential charging customers.
Second-Life EV Battery Market in India: What Is Driving Demand from Manufacturers?
India’s second-life EV battery market is gaining relevance as electric vehicle adoption expands and batteries retain useful capacity after automotive service. Growing stationary-storage demand, battery data, refurbishment capabilities, EPR obligations, and critical-mineral policies are encouraging manufacturers to extend battery value through reuse before eventual recycling within India’s emerging circular battery ecosystem.
The Rise of Locally Manufactured Battery Separators in India’s EV Ecosystem
India’s battery industry is progressing from pack assembly toward domestic cell and material manufacturing, creating opportunities for lithium-ion battery separators. Policy support, ACC capacity expansion and R&D initiatives are strengthening the ecosystem. However, technical complexity, manufacturing yields, qualification requirements and economics mean localisation will likely advance gradually through coatings, testing and finishing.
